I’ve wanted to read this since I visited the house or what might be the inspiration for the house at age 12, maybe? I’ve read the Marble Faun and Rappacini’s Daughter which I mostly liked and, of course, The Scarlet Letter, which I think I mostly didn’t. Fine writing marred by puritanical outlook is my assessment so far, but I’ll give him another shot for the fine writing and I like a good readalong.
I wish I’d managed to finish Moby-Dick before starting this, but I think I’ll still finish Moby. Only about 80 pages left. The interesting thing is that Hawthorne and Melville were friends and met while Melville was writing Moby-Dick. Hawthorne wrote Seven Gables shortly after they met. So it seems appropriate to read them almost together. I’ve started both Seven Gables and Hangsaman so I’m plunging into Peril with great abandon. The description of the house is not all that much like the house they say it was based on, except for the gables. The book talks about the upper floors overhanging the lower ones, diamond pane windows and ornamented with quaint figures.
Its whole visible exterior was ornamented with quaint figures, conceived in the grotesqueness of a Gothic fancy, and drawn or stamped in the glittering plaster, composed of lime, pebbles, and bits of glass, with which the woodwork of the walls was overspread. On every side the seven gables pointed sharply towards the sky, and presented the aspect of a whole sisterhood of edifices, breathing through the spiracles of one great chimney. The many lattices, with their small, diamond-shaped panes, admitted the sunlight into hall and chamber, while, nevertheless, the second story, projecting far over the base, and itself retiring beneath the third, threw a shadowy and thoughtful gloom into the lower rooms. Carved globes of wood were affixed under the jutting stories. Little spiral rods of iron beautified each of the seven peaks...
I would love to see an artist’s depiction of the house based on the description in the book. It sounds spookier and definitely gaudier. But still the story’s off to a good start. Hope I can stick with it. It is, of course, much easier to read Shirley Jackson. In fact, it’s difficult to stop reading Shirley Jackson. Hangsaman focuses on 17 year old Natalie, who’s leaving home and heading for college in 3 weeks. Natalie has very peculiar coping mechanisms for dealing with her life at home which seems to be rather hellacious to her for reasons that aren’t entirely clear to me. I can’t help wondering how much like Shirley Jackson’s life the Waite’s family life is. I seem to remember them hosting academic parties. It reads something like I remember their life from her bio, but it was so long ago I can’t be sure.
Yesterday was the first anniversary of this blog and I meant to write a post marking the occasion and summing up the year and all that, but I didn’t, and I’m not going to because I think there’s a reason I didn’t except to say that I think this blog has really kept me reading. Well, this blog and others’. Reading other peoples’ blogs and joining their readalongs and ‘thons has kept it all interesting. Reading can be a lonely enterprise especially when you read something kickass and no one you know in real life pays any attention. You can post it and hope to find someone whose life will be enriched a little as yours is by finding new books to read or just being entertained by their observations even when you don’t want to read the book in question. Here’s to every blogger I’ve read and everyone who’s read me this year — thank you all! Hoping for another enjoyable year!